Proto-Indo-European is spoken
node
The reconstructed ancestor of the Indo-European languages was spoken by a real community at a date conventionally placed in the fourth to third millennium BCE, and in a place that remains the most argued question in the field. The linguistic evidence for the date is indirect and derives from the reconstructed vocabulary: securely recoverable terms for wheeled transport and for wool and dairying place the proto-language after those technologies existed, giving an earliest bound that archaeology can supply. Both the date and the location are stated here as contested, not resolved; the catalogue timeline for this Journey gives the same approximate date with the same caveat.
A node is not a place. Drawing it on a map would assert something about the world that no stored fact supports.
Read in · 1
Evidence · 1
Timeline
No dated observations are stored for this object. Atlas shows what was observed and when — it does not infer a history.
Connections · 3
- Proto-Indo-Europeanconcerns
- The Pontic–Caspian steppeconcerns
- Indo-Europeanconcerns
Assembled narrative · 1
Assembled from 38 blocks · 1 evidence · 30 related
- Story
- The reconstructed ancestor of the Indo-European languages was spoken by a real community at a date conventionally placed in the fourth to third millennium BCE, and in a place that remains the most argued question in the field. The linguistic evidence for the date is indirect and derives from the reconstructed vocabulary: securely recoverable terms for wheeled transport and for wool and dairying place the proto-language after those technologies existed, giving an earliest bound that archaeology can supply. Both the date and the location are stated here as contested, not resolved; the catalogue timeline for this Journey gives the same approximate date with the same caveat.
- Knowledge
- Indo-European
- Proto-Indo-European
- The Pontic–Caspian steppe
- Proto-Indo-European is spoken
- Connections
- Proto-Indo-European
- The Pontic–Caspian steppe
- Indo-European
- Indo-European
- The comparative method
- Anatolia
- The Pontic–Caspian steppe
- Saussure posits consonants no language attests
- Kuryłowicz matches Hittite h to Saussure's coefficients
- Proto-Indo-European is spoken
- A Bayesian phylogeny dates Indo-European to the Anatolian Neolithic
- Ancient DNA finds a mass movement from the steppe into Europe
- A hybrid model is proposed for the Indo-European origin
- Ancient DNA as a check on linguistic prehistory
- Proto-Indo-European
- Proto-Indo-European is spoken
- Ancient DNA finds a mass movement from the steppe into Europe
- A hybrid model is proposed for the Indo-European origin
- Proto-Indo-European
- Uralic
- Trans-New Guinea
- Dravidian
- Hittite
- Sanskrit
- Jones states the Indo-European hypothesis in Calcutta
- Hrozný identifies Hittite as an Indo-European language
- Proto-Indo-European is spoken
- Phylogeography puts the Indo-European homeland in Anatolia
- Evidence
- Supports the steppe hypothesis as argued from reconstructed wheeled-vehicle and wool vocabulary, the archaeology of the Pontic–Caspian region, and the Indo-Iranian loanword strata in Uralic. V55 verification basis: this session had no access to any source — WebFetch was egress-blocked for every host attempted and the WebSearch budget was exhausted before authoring — so the cited work was not retrieved, and no page, volume or figure quoted from it was re-checked. No page is cited and no reconstructed form is quoted from the book; the date of horse domestication, which the book discusses and which has been revised since, is deliberately not stated anywhere in this pack.
Observed changes · 0
No public Signals are attached to this object. Signals show what changed and when it was observed — never a direction or a rank.
Actions
/atlas?object=EVENT_LF_PIE_SPOKEN&experience=EVENT_LF_PIE_SPOKEN