Skip to content
RichseenAtlasAtlasSign in

Chicxulub is identified as the K–Pg impact crater

node

Hildebrand and colleagues published the case that a buried circular structure beneath the northern Yucatán Peninsula is an impact crater of Cretaceous–Palaeogene age, drawing together the geophysical anomaly mapped by Pemex geophysicists in the late 1970s, drill-core material, shocked quartz and the distribution of boundary deposits around the Gulf of Mexico. The gap between the 1980 hypothesis and the 1991 identification is the most instructive part of the story: for eleven years the impact hypothesis rested on a global chemical signature with no crater, and the crater when found had already been drilled by an oil company that had interpreted it as a volcanic feature.

A node is not a place. Drawing it on a map would assert something about the world that no stored fact supports.

Read in · 1

Evidence · 1
Timeline

No dated observations are stored for this object. Atlas shows what was observed and when — it does not infer a history.

Connections · 2
Assembled narrative · 1

Assembled from 20 blocks · 1 evidence · 9 related

  1. Story
  2. Hildebrand and colleagues published the case that a buried circular structure beneath the northern Yucatán Peninsula is an impact crater of Cretaceous–Palaeogene age, drawing together the geophysical anomaly mapped by Pemex geophysicists in the late 1970s, drill-core material, shocked quartz and the distribution of boundary deposits around the Gulf of Mexico. The gap between the 1980 hypothesis and the 1991 identification is the most instructive part of the story: for eleven years the impact hypothesis rested on a global chemical signature with no crater, and the crater when found had already been drilled by an oil company that had interpreted it as a volcanic feature.
  3. Knowledge
  4. The Cretaceous–Palaeogene iridium anomaly
  5. Chicxulub impact crater, Yucatán
  6. Chicxulub is identified as the K–Pg impact crater
  7. Connections
  8. Chicxulub impact crater, Yucatán
  9. The Cretaceous–Palaeogene iridium anomaly
  10. The Cretaceous–Palaeogene mass extinction
  11. The K–Pg boundary is dated to 66.043 ± 0.043 Ma
  12. Chicxulub is identified as the K–Pg impact crater
  13. IODP–ICDP Expedition 364 drills the Chicxulub peak ring
  14. The Cretaceous–Palaeogene mass extinction
  15. Bottaccione Gorge, Gubbio
  16. The Cretaceous–Palaeogene mass extinction
  17. The Alvarez impact hypothesis is published
  18. Chicxulub is identified as the K–Pg impact crater
  19. Evidence
  20. Supports the identification of the buried Yucatán structure as an impact crater of Cretaceous–Palaeogene age. V55 verification basis: this session had no network access to any source — WebFetch was egress-blocked and the WebSearch budget was exhausted — so the cited work was not retrieved and its pagination was not re-checked. Volume and page range are quoted from standing knowledge and were not re-checked.
Close the narrative
Observed changes · 0

No public Signals are attached to this object. Signals show what changed and when it was observed — never a direction or a rank.

Actions

Read the assembled narrativeContinue in StudioOpen TwinTwin does not start a decision from this kind of object.ShareSaveSaved objects are part of the authenticated projection, which is declared and not yet built.

/atlas?object=EVT_CHICXULUB_IDENTIFIED_1991&experience=EVT_CHICXULUB_IDENTIFIED_1991