Skip to content
RichseenAtlasAtlasSign in

ImageNet is assembled and released

node

Fei-Fei Li's group began building a labelled image collection at a scale nobody had attempted, organised on the WordNet noun hierarchy and annotated largely through crowdsourced work, and released it from 2009. The bet was explicit and contrarian: that recognition was limited by the absence of data rather than by algorithm design. The annual challenge run on a subset of it from 2010 turned that bet into a public scoreboard, which is what allowed the 2012 result to be recognised immediately as a result.

A node is not a place. Drawing it on a map would assert something about the world that no stored fact supports.

Read in · 1

Evidence · 1
Timeline

No dated observations are stored for this object. Atlas shows what was observed and when — it does not infer a history.

Connections · 2
Assembled narrative · 1

Assembled from 19 blocks · 1 evidence · 15 related

  1. Story
  2. Fei-Fei Li's group began building a labelled image collection at a scale nobody had attempted, organised on the WordNet noun hierarchy and annotated largely through crowdsourced work, and released it from 2009. The bet was explicit and contrarian: that recognition was limited by the absence of data rather than by algorithm design. The annual challenge run on a subset of it from 2010 turned that bet into a public scoreboard, which is what allowed the 2012 result to be recognised immediately as a result.
  3. Knowledge
  4. ImageNet
  5. Fei-Fei Li
  6. ImageNet is assembled and released
  7. Connections
  8. ImageNet
  9. Fei-Fei Li
  10. Deep learning
  11. Fei-Fei Li
  12. ImageNet is assembled and released
  13. A deep convolutional network wins the ImageNet challenge
  14. ImageNet
  15. Benchmark saturation
  16. ImageNet is assembled and released
  17. The AI Index records both fast benchmark movement and doubts about benchmarks
  18. Evidence
  19. An eight-layer convolutional network — five convolutional and three fully connected layers — trained on graphics processors with dropout regularisation achieved a top-5 error rate of 15.3% at ILSVRC 2012 against 26.2% for the second-placed entry, learning hierarchical features rather than using hand-designed ones. V55 verification basis: the paper was not fetched. The 15.3% and 26.2% figures and the architecture description were carried in multiple retrieved summaries and in a hosted copy of the paper itself, but the attribution in those summaries is to secondary explainers as often as to the paper, and a curator should confirm both error rates against the ILSVRC 2012 results table before publication.
Close the narrative
Observed changes · 0

No public Signals are attached to this object. Signals show what changed and when it was observed — never a direction or a rank.

Actions

Read the assembled narrativeContinue in StudioOpen TwinTwin does not start a decision from this kind of object.ShareSaveSaved objects are part of the authenticated projection, which is declared and not yet built.

/atlas?object=EVT_IMAGENET_RELEASED_2009&experience=EVT_IMAGENET_RELEASED_2009