Skip to content
RichseenAtlasAtlasSign in

Hittite

node · earth · Central Anatolia

The language of the Hittite state of central Anatolia in the second millennium BCE, written in cuneiform on clay tablets and the earliest substantially attested Indo-European language. It was unknown as an Indo-European language until Bedřich Hrozný announced the identification in 1915, working from tablets excavated at Boğazköy less than a decade earlier; the argument turned on recognising Indo-European inflectional endings and vocabulary inside a text otherwise written in a familiar script but an unfamiliar tongue. Its consequences for reconstruction were immediate and structural. Hittite preserved a consonant, conventionally transcribed h, in a large share of the positions where Saussure had in 1879 posited abstract elements on purely internal grounds — a prediction made forty years before the evidence existed and confirmed by a spade. Hittite also proved archaic in ways that forced the family tree itself to be redrawn: it lacks features previously assumed to be Proto-Indo-European, and Anatolian is now widely treated as the first branch to separate, which makes the reconstructed ancestor of the other branches a later stage than the ancestor of all.

Read in · 1

Evidence · 2
Timeline

No dated observations are stored for this object. Atlas shows what was observed and when — it does not infer a history.

Connections · 2
Assembled narrative · 1

Assembled from 30 blocks · 2 evidence · 21 related

  1. Story
  2. The language of the Hittite state of central Anatolia in the second millennium BCE, written in cuneiform on clay tablets and the earliest substantially attested Indo-European language. It was unknown as an Indo-European language until Bedřich Hrozný announced the identification in 1915, working from tablets excavated at Boğazköy less than a decade earlier; the argument turned on recognising Indo-European inflectional endings and vocabulary inside a text otherwise written in a familiar script but an unfamiliar tongue. Its consequences for reconstruction were immediate and structural. Hittite preserved a consonant, conventionally transcribed h, in a large share of the positions where Saussure had in 1879 posited abstract elements on purely internal grounds — a prediction made forty years before the evidence existed and confirmed by a spade. Hittite also proved archaic in ways that forced the family tree itself to be redrawn: it lacks features previously assumed to be Proto-Indo-European, and Anatolian is now widely treated as the first branch to separate, which makes the reconstructed ancestor of the other branches a later stage than the ancestor of all.
  3. Knowledge
  4. Laryngeal theory
  5. Indo-European
  6. Hittite
  7. Connections
  8. Laryngeal theory
  9. Indo-European
  10. Hattusa (Boğazkale)
  11. The Boğazköy tablet archives are excavated
  12. Hrozný identifies Hittite as an Indo-European language
  13. Kuryłowicz matches Hittite h to Saussure's coefficients
  14. Ferdinand de Saussure
  15. Hittite
  16. Saussure posits consonants no language attests
  17. Kuryłowicz matches Hittite h to Saussure's coefficients
  18. Proto-Indo-European
  19. Uralic
  20. Trans-New Guinea
  21. Dravidian
  22. Hittite
  23. Sanskrit
  24. Jones states the Indo-European hypothesis in Calcutta
  25. Hrozný identifies Hittite as an Indo-European language
  26. Proto-Indo-European is spoken
  27. Phylogeography puts the Indo-European homeland in Anatolia
  28. Evidence
  29. Supports the identification of Hittite as an Indo-European language, announced in 1915 and set out in full in this volume. V55 verification basis: this session had no access to any source — WebFetch was egress-blocked for every host attempted and the WebSearch budget was exhausted before authoring — so the cited work was not retrieved, and no page, volume or figure quoted from it was re-checked. The 1915 announcement date and the 1906 excavation date under Winckler are given from standing knowledge of the history of the decipherment, not from this volume.
  30. Supports the identification of the Hittite laryngeal with Saussure's posited coefficients, which is the corroboration of laryngeal theory. V55 verification basis: this session had no access to any source — WebFetch was egress-blocked for every host attempted and the WebSearch budget was exhausted before authoring — so the cited work was not retrieved, and no page, volume or figure quoted from it was re-checked. Cited without pagination; the title is given in the form conventional in the Indo-European literature and was not verified against the volume.
Close the narrative
Observed changes · 0

No public Signals are attached to this object. Signals show what changed and when it was observed — never a direction or a rank.

Actions

Read the assembled narrativeContinue in StudioOpen TwinTwin does not start a decision from this kind of object.ShareSaveSaved objects are part of the authenticated projection, which is declared and not yet built.

/atlas?object=LANGUAGE_HITTITE&experience=LANGUAGE_HITTITE