Hittite
node · earth · Central Anatolia
The language of the Hittite state of central Anatolia in the second millennium BCE, written in cuneiform on clay tablets and the earliest substantially attested Indo-European language. It was unknown as an Indo-European language until Bedřich Hrozný announced the identification in 1915, working from tablets excavated at Boğazköy less than a decade earlier; the argument turned on recognising Indo-European inflectional endings and vocabulary inside a text otherwise written in a familiar script but an unfamiliar tongue. Its consequences for reconstruction were immediate and structural. Hittite preserved a consonant, conventionally transcribed h, in a large share of the positions where Saussure had in 1879 posited abstract elements on purely internal grounds — a prediction made forty years before the evidence existed and confirmed by a spade. Hittite also proved archaic in ways that forced the family tree itself to be redrawn: it lacks features previously assumed to be Proto-Indo-European, and Anatolian is now widely treated as the first branch to separate, which makes the reconstructed ancestor of the other branches a later stage than the ancestor of all.
Read in · 1
Evidence · 2
Timeline
No dated observations are stored for this object. Atlas shows what was observed and when — it does not infer a history.
Connections · 2
- Laryngeal theoryevidence_for
- Indo-Europeanmember_of
Assembled narrative · 1
Assembled from 30 blocks · 2 evidence · 21 related
- Story
- The language of the Hittite state of central Anatolia in the second millennium BCE, written in cuneiform on clay tablets and the earliest substantially attested Indo-European language. It was unknown as an Indo-European language until Bedřich Hrozný announced the identification in 1915, working from tablets excavated at Boğazköy less than a decade earlier; the argument turned on recognising Indo-European inflectional endings and vocabulary inside a text otherwise written in a familiar script but an unfamiliar tongue. Its consequences for reconstruction were immediate and structural. Hittite preserved a consonant, conventionally transcribed h, in a large share of the positions where Saussure had in 1879 posited abstract elements on purely internal grounds — a prediction made forty years before the evidence existed and confirmed by a spade. Hittite also proved archaic in ways that forced the family tree itself to be redrawn: it lacks features previously assumed to be Proto-Indo-European, and Anatolian is now widely treated as the first branch to separate, which makes the reconstructed ancestor of the other branches a later stage than the ancestor of all.
- Knowledge
- Laryngeal theory
- Indo-European
- Hittite
- Connections
- Laryngeal theory
- Indo-European
- Hattusa (Boğazkale)
- The Boğazköy tablet archives are excavated
- Hrozný identifies Hittite as an Indo-European language
- Kuryłowicz matches Hittite h to Saussure's coefficients
- Ferdinand de Saussure
- Hittite
- Saussure posits consonants no language attests
- Kuryłowicz matches Hittite h to Saussure's coefficients
- Proto-Indo-European
- Uralic
- Trans-New Guinea
- Dravidian
- Hittite
- Sanskrit
- Jones states the Indo-European hypothesis in Calcutta
- Hrozný identifies Hittite as an Indo-European language
- Proto-Indo-European is spoken
- Phylogeography puts the Indo-European homeland in Anatolia
- Evidence
- Supports the identification of Hittite as an Indo-European language, announced in 1915 and set out in full in this volume. V55 verification basis: this session had no access to any source — WebFetch was egress-blocked for every host attempted and the WebSearch budget was exhausted before authoring — so the cited work was not retrieved, and no page, volume or figure quoted from it was re-checked. The 1915 announcement date and the 1906 excavation date under Winckler are given from standing knowledge of the history of the decipherment, not from this volume.
- Supports the identification of the Hittite laryngeal with Saussure's posited coefficients, which is the corroboration of laryngeal theory. V55 verification basis: this session had no access to any source — WebFetch was egress-blocked for every host attempted and the WebSearch budget was exhausted before authoring — so the cited work was not retrieved, and no page, volume or figure quoted from it was re-checked. Cited without pagination; the title is given in the form conventional in the Indo-European literature and was not verified against the volume.
Observed changes · 0
No public Signals are attached to this object. Signals show what changed and when it was observed — never a direction or a rank.
Actions
/atlas?object=LANGUAGE_HITTITE&experience=LANGUAGE_HITTITE