Skip to content
RichseenAtlasAtlasSign in

Colonial prohibition of drumming

node · earth · British mainland North America, principally the Carolinas

The legal suppression of African drumming across much of the English-speaking Americas, and one of the clearest cases in this Journey of law shaping sound. After the Stono Rebellion of 9 September 1739, in which a group of enslaved people led by a man named Jemmy marched from the Stono river with drums and banners, the South Carolina assembly passed a comprehensive slave code on 10 May 1740 — the Negro Act — which among many other restrictions barred enslaved people from assembling and from using drums, horns and other loud instruments. The stated reasoning was that drums were a signalling technology capable of assembling people across distance, which is accurate: that is one of the things a West African ensemble drum does. Comparable prohibitions spread through other British mainland colonies. The musical consequence is structural rather than incidental. Where drums were banned, the ensemble's timeline and interlock had to be rebuilt on whatever was legal — clapping, stamping, the body, a stringed instrument, a voice — and traditions that grew up under prohibition are string-led and percussion-poor in exactly the way the drum-permitting Catholic colonies of Cuba and Brazil are not.

Read in · 1

Evidence · 2
Timeline

No dated observations are stored for this object. Atlas shows what was observed and when — it does not infer a history.

Connections · 1
Assembled narrative · 1

Assembled from 18 blocks · 2 evidence · 13 related

  1. Story
  2. The legal suppression of African drumming across much of the English-speaking Americas, and one of the clearest cases in this Journey of law shaping sound. After the Stono Rebellion of 9 September 1739, in which a group of enslaved people led by a man named Jemmy marched from the Stono river with drums and banners, the South Carolina assembly passed a comprehensive slave code on 10 May 1740 — the Negro Act — which among many other restrictions barred enslaved people from assembling and from using drums, horns and other loud instruments. The stated reasoning was that drums were a signalling technology capable of assembling people across distance, which is accurate: that is one of the things a West African ensemble drum does. Comparable prohibitions spread through other British mainland colonies. The musical consequence is structural rather than incidental. Where drums were banned, the ensemble's timeline and interlock had to be rebuilt on whatever was legal — clapping, stamping, the body, a stringed instrument, a voice — and traditions that grew up under prohibition are string-led and percussion-poor in exactly the way the drum-permitting Catholic colonies of Cuba and Brazil are not.
  3. Knowledge
  4. Colonial prohibition of drumming
  5. The Stono Rebellion
  6. Connections
  7. The West African drum ensemble
  8. The Stono Rebellion
  9. Blues
  10. The Stono Rebellion
  11. The South Carolina Negro Act prohibits drums
  12. New Orleans confines Sunday gatherings to Congo Square
  13. Colonial prohibition of drumming
  14. Colonial prohibition of drumming
  15. The West African drum ensemble
  16. Evidence
  17. The Act restricted assembly, movement, earning and literacy among enslaved people and barred the use of drums, horns and other loud instruments, the colonial authorities holding that drums functioned as a means of assembly and signalling. V55 verification basis: retrieved in search summary from encyclopaedic and museum accounts; the statute text was not read, and no section or clause number is cited.
  18. Kubik traces the blues principally to the west-central Sudanic belt rather than to the West African coast, identifying an "ancient Negritic" and an Islamic strand, and characterising rural Deep South blues as solo, string-accompanied, percussion-free, pentatonic and marked by wavy intonation. V55 verification basis: the book is cited as the standing authority and is named in the Journey's own declared references; it was NOT read in this session, and the account of its argument comes from retrieved summaries and reviews.
Close the narrative
Observed changes · 0

No public Signals are attached to this object. Signals show what changed and when it was observed — never a direction or a rank.

Actions

Read the assembled narrativeContinue in StudioOpen TwinTwin does not start a decision from this kind of object.ShareSaveSaved objects are part of the authenticated projection, which is declared and not yet built.

/atlas?object=PHENOMENON_DRUM_PROHIBITION&experience=PHENOMENON_DRUM_PROHIBITION