Skip to content
RichseenAtlasAtlasSign in

The flying buttress

node · earth · Western Europe

A half-arch that springs from a free-standing masonry pier outside the building, leaps the aisle roof, and lands on the outer face of the high wall exactly where the vault pushes. It does one job: it takes the outward thrust of the high vault, and the wind load on the high wall and roof, and walks both down to the ground outside the building. Because the flyer intercepts the thrust above the aisle, the high wall no longer needs the mass that would otherwise be required to resist it, and the space between the piers can be opened as window. Robert Mark's photoelastic model studies at Princeton in the 1970s and 1980s argued that wind loading on the tall roof and clerestory was a far larger design driver than the vault thrust alone - which, if right, means the flyer is as much a wind brace as a vault prop. The upper flyers at Chartres and elsewhere sit high on the wall in a position that makes little sense as a vault prop and good sense as a wind brace.

Read in · 1

Evidence · 2
Timeline

No dated observations are stored for this object. Atlas shows what was observed and when — it does not infer a history.

Connections · 0
    Assembled narrative · 1

    Assembled from 13 blocks · 2 evidence · 13 related

    1. Story
    2. A half-arch that springs from a free-standing masonry pier outside the building, leaps the aisle roof, and lands on the outer face of the high wall exactly where the vault pushes. It does one job: it takes the outward thrust of the high vault, and the wind load on the high wall and roof, and walks both down to the ground outside the building. Because the flyer intercepts the thrust above the aisle, the high wall no longer needs the mass that would otherwise be required to resist it, and the space between the piers can be opened as window. Robert Mark's photoelastic model studies at Princeton in the 1970s and 1980s argued that wind loading on the tall roof and clerestory was a far larger design driver than the vault thrust alone - which, if right, means the flyer is as much a wind brace as a vault prop. The upper flyers at Chartres and elsewhere sit high on the wall in a position that makes little sense as a vault prop and good sense as a wind brace.
    3. Knowledge
    4. The flying buttress
    5. Connections
    6. The Gothic rib vault
    7. Chartres Cathedral
    8. Notre-Dame de Paris
    9. Notre-Dame de Paris is begun
    10. The high vaults of Chartres close at about 36-37 m
    11. Evidence
    12. Photoelastic model studies of Gothic structures arguing that wind loading on the high roof and clerestory, rather than vault thrust alone, was a principal design driver for flying buttresses, and that upper flyers are best explained as wind bracing. V55 verification basis: real and widely cited; not read in this session, and the argument is summarised here from its reception rather than from the text.
    13. Reconstructs how Gothic vaults were actually erected, with centring, falsework and sequence as the central problem, and treats the economy of timber formwork as a driver of the rib vault. Supports the STRUCTURE_GOTHIC_VAULT and Gothic site records. V55 verification basis: real and standard, not consulted in this session.
    Close the narrative
    Observed changes · 0

    No public Signals are attached to this object. Signals show what changed and when it was observed — never a direction or a rank.

    Actions

    Read the assembled narrativeContinue in StudioOpen TwinTwin does not start a decision from this kind of object.ShareSaveSaved objects are part of the authenticated projection, which is declared and not yet built.

    /atlas?object=STRUCTURE_FLYING_BUTTRESS&experience=STRUCTURE_FLYING_BUTTRESS