Phylogeography puts the Indo-European homeland in Anatolia

Assembled from 42 blocks · 1 evidence · 34 related

1. Story
2. Bouckaert and colleagues extended the Bayesian approach by modelling the geographic spread of the family as a diffusion process on the tree, and reported strongest support for an origin in Anatolia with expansion associated with agriculture. The paper drew sustained criticism from comparative linguists and archaeologists over its cognate data, its treatment of extinct languages, the geographic model's indifference to terrain and migration corridors, and the omission of the reconstructed wheeled-vehicle vocabulary that constrains the proto-language's date.
3. Knowledge
4. Bayesian phylogenetic dating of language families
5. Indo-European
6. Anatolia
7. Phylogeography puts the Indo-European homeland in Anatolia
8. Ancient DNA finds a mass movement from the steppe into Europe
9. Connections
10. Ancient DNA finds a mass movement from the steppe into Europe
11. Bayesian phylogenetic dating of language families
12. Anatolia
13. Indo-European
14. Phylogeography puts the Indo-European homeland in Anatolia
15. Ancient DNA as a check on linguistic prehistory
16. The Pontic–Caspian steppe
17. Proto-Indo-European
18. The comparative method
19. Glottochronology
20. A language tree is tested against a settlement chronology
21. A Bayesian phylogeny dates Indo-European to the Anatolian Neolithic
22. Phylogeography puts the Indo-European homeland in Anatolia
23. A hybrid model is proposed for the Indo-European origin
24. A dated phylogeny puts Sino-Tibetan at roughly seven thousand years
25. A second phylogeny puts the same family at roughly six thousand years
26. Proto-Indo-European
27. Hattusa (Boğazkale)
28. A Bayesian phylogeny dates Indo-European to the Anatolian Neolithic
29. Phylogeography puts the Indo-European homeland in Anatolia
30. A hybrid model is proposed for the Indo-European origin
31. Proto-Indo-European
32. Uralic
33. Trans-New Guinea
34. Dravidian
35. Hittite
36. Sanskrit
37. Jones states the Indo-European hypothesis in Calcutta
38. Hrozný identifies Hittite as an Indo-European language
39. Proto-Indo-European is spoken
40. Phylogeography puts the Indo-European homeland in Anatolia
41. Evidence
42. Supports the reported phylogeographic inference of an Anatolian origin for Indo-European, and is cited here together with the criticism it attracted rather than as a settled result. V55 verification basis: this session had no access to any source — WebFetch was egress-blocked for every host attempted and the WebSearch budget was exhausted before authoring — so the cited work was not retrieved, and no page, volume or figure quoted from it was re-checked. Volume number from standing knowledge; page range omitted rather than guessed.