Skip to content
RichseenAtlasAtlasSign in

A Bayesian phylogeny dates Indo-European to the Anatolian Neolithic

node

Gray and Atkinson applied Bayesian phylogenetic inference with a relaxed molecular-clock model to Indo-European cognate data and obtained a root age of roughly eight to ten thousand years, consistent with the hypothesis that the family spread with the expansion of farming out of Anatolia rather than with steppe pastoralists in the fourth millennium BCE. The result put a quantitative method behind a hypothesis that comparative linguists had largely rejected, and opened a dispute that is still running. Critics objected to the cognate coding, the calibration priors and the treatment of borrowing.

A node is not a place. Drawing it on a map would assert something about the world that no stored fact supports.

Read in · 1

Evidence · 1
Timeline

No dated observations are stored for this object. Atlas shows what was observed and when — it does not infer a history.

Connections · 3
Assembled narrative · 1

Assembled from 36 blocks · 1 evidence · 31 related

  1. Story
  2. Gray and Atkinson applied Bayesian phylogenetic inference with a relaxed molecular-clock model to Indo-European cognate data and obtained a root age of roughly eight to ten thousand years, consistent with the hypothesis that the family spread with the expansion of farming out of Anatolia rather than with steppe pastoralists in the fourth millennium BCE. The result put a quantitative method behind a hypothesis that comparative linguists had largely rejected, and opened a dispute that is still running. Critics objected to the cognate coding, the calibration priors and the treatment of borrowing.
  3. Knowledge
  4. Bayesian phylogenetic dating of language families
  5. Proto-Indo-European
  6. Anatolia
  7. A Bayesian phylogeny dates Indo-European to the Anatolian Neolithic
  8. Connections
  9. Bayesian phylogenetic dating of language families
  10. Anatolia
  11. Proto-Indo-European
  12. The comparative method
  13. Glottochronology
  14. A language tree is tested against a settlement chronology
  15. A Bayesian phylogeny dates Indo-European to the Anatolian Neolithic
  16. Phylogeography puts the Indo-European homeland in Anatolia
  17. A hybrid model is proposed for the Indo-European origin
  18. A dated phylogeny puts Sino-Tibetan at roughly seven thousand years
  19. A second phylogeny puts the same family at roughly six thousand years
  20. Proto-Indo-European
  21. Hattusa (Boğazkale)
  22. A Bayesian phylogeny dates Indo-European to the Anatolian Neolithic
  23. Phylogeography puts the Indo-European homeland in Anatolia
  24. A hybrid model is proposed for the Indo-European origin
  25. Indo-European
  26. The comparative method
  27. Anatolia
  28. The Pontic–Caspian steppe
  29. Saussure posits consonants no language attests
  30. Kuryłowicz matches Hittite h to Saussure's coefficients
  31. Proto-Indo-European is spoken
  32. A Bayesian phylogeny dates Indo-European to the Anatolian Neolithic
  33. Ancient DNA finds a mass movement from the steppe into Europe
  34. A hybrid model is proposed for the Indo-European origin
  35. Evidence
  36. Supports the reported Bayesian root-age estimate for Indo-European of roughly eight to ten thousand years and its use in favour of the Anatolian hypothesis. V55 verification basis: this session had no access to any source — WebFetch was egress-blocked for every host attempted and the WebSearch budget was exhausted before authoring — so the cited work was not retrieved, and no page, volume or figure quoted from it was re-checked. The age is given as a range from standing knowledge of the reported result; the paper's own credible interval is not quoted, and the page range is omitted rather than guessed.
Close the narrative
Observed changes · 0

No public Signals are attached to this object. Signals show what changed and when it was observed — never a direction or a rank.

Actions

Read the assembled narrativeContinue in StudioOpen TwinTwin does not start a decision from this kind of object.ShareSaveSaved objects are part of the authenticated projection, which is declared and not yet built.

/atlas?object=EVT_LF_GRAY_ATKINSON_2003&experience=EVT_LF_GRAY_ATKINSON_2003