List of World Heritage in Danger
node · earth · Global
A separate list, provided for in Article 11(4) of the Convention, of inscribed properties threatened by serious and specific dangers — armed conflict, large-scale public or private projects, urban development, tourism pressure, abandonment, natural disaster. It is designed as a mechanism for mobilising assistance and corrective action, not as a punishment, and inscription on it does not require the State Party's consent. In practice it is read politically: some States treat it as a call for help (Mali, Cambodia), others as a national humiliation to be resisted (Germany over Dresden, Italy over Venice, the UK over Liverpool). Danger listing is the usual, but not compulsory, precursor to deletion.
Read in · 1
Evidence · 2
Timeline
No dated observations are stored for this object. Atlas shows what was observed and when — it does not infer a history.
Connections · 1
Assembled narrative · 1
Assembled from 37 blocks · 2 evidence · 33 related
- Story
- A separate list, provided for in Article 11(4) of the Convention, of inscribed properties threatened by serious and specific dangers — armed conflict, large-scale public or private projects, urban development, tourism pressure, abandonment, natural disaster. It is designed as a mechanism for mobilising assistance and corrective action, not as a punishment, and inscription on it does not require the State Party's consent. In practice it is read politically: some States treat it as a call for help (Mali, Cambodia), others as a national humiliation to be resisted (Germany over Dresden, Italy over Venice, the UK over Liverpool). Danger listing is the usual, but not compulsory, precursor to deletion.
- Knowledge
- Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage (1972)
- List of World Heritage in Danger
- Connections
- Outstanding Universal Value and the ten selection criteria
- Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage (1972)
- Venice and its Lagoon
- Dresden Elbe Valley (delisted 2009)
- Liverpool – Maritime Mercantile City (delisted 2021)
- Timbuktu
- Site of Palmyra
- Galápagos Islands
- Angkor
- Angkor inscribed on the World Heritage List and the danger list on the same day
- Angkor removed from the List of World Heritage in Danger
- Galápagos Islands placed on the List of World Heritage in Danger
- Arabian Oryx Sanctuary deleted — the first site ever removed from the World Heritage List
- Dresden Elbe Valley deleted — the second removal, by a vote of 14 to 5
- Fourteen of Timbuktu's sixteen inscribed mausoleums destroyed
- Liverpool – Maritime Mercantile City placed on the List of World Heritage in Danger
- The Temple of Bel at Palmyra destroyed
- Liverpool – Maritime Mercantile City deleted — the third and most recent removal
- The Committee declines, again, to place Venice on the danger list
- UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization)
- Site of Palmyra
- Outstanding Universal Value and the ten selection criteria
- List of World Heritage in Danger
- World Heritage Committee
- International Campaign to Save the Monuments of Nubia
- UNESCO General Conference adopts the World Heritage Convention
- The Convention enters into force
- ICC convicts Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi for the destruction of Timbuktu's mausoleums
- Evidence
- Establishes the World Heritage List, the List of World Heritage in Danger, the 21-member World Heritage Committee, the World Heritage Fund, and names ICCROM, ICOMOS and IUCN as advisory bodies; asserts a duty on the international community as a whole to co-operate in protecting heritage of outstanding universal value while leaving sovereignty with the State Party.
- Sets the ten selection criteria, the conditions of integrity and authenticity, the Tentative List and nomination dossier procedure, the criteria for inscription on and removal from the List of World Heritage in Danger, and the procedure for deletion from the World Heritage List. ALSO: Until the end of 2004 sites were selected on six cultural and four natural criteria; from the 2005 Operational Guidelines a single set of ten criteria applies, and a property must meet at least one of them plus demonstrate Outstanding Universal Value.
Observed changes · 0
No public Signals are attached to this object. Signals show what changed and when it was observed — never a direction or a rank.
Actions
/atlas?object=LIST_IN_DANGER&experience=LIST_IN_DANGER