Impact of caloric restriction on health and survival in rhesus monkeys from the NIA study

evidence

Supports the NIA finding of no significant survival benefit from caloric restriction in rhesus macaques, contradicting the Wisconsin cohort. V55 verification basis: not retrieved; the 2017 joint reanalysis attributing the divergence to diet and control feeding is described but not separately cited.

A evidence is not a place. Drawing it on a map would assert something about the world that no stored fact supports.

Evidence · 0

This object cites no evidence.

Timeline

No dated observations are stored for this object. Atlas shows what was observed and when — it does not infer a history.

Connections · 0

Assembled narrative · 0

This object does not clear the publishing floor: an assembled narrative needs a description and at least one cited piece of evidence.

Observed changes · 0

No public Signals are attached to this object. Signals show what changed and when it was observed — never a direction or a rank.

Actions

Read the assembled narrativeThis object has no public Experience: one needs a description and at least one cited piece of evidence.Continue in StudioOpen TwinTwin does not start a decision from this kind of object.ShareSaveSaved objects are part of the authenticated projection, which is declared and not yet built.

/atlas?object=EVIDENCE_EV_RHESUS_CR_NIA_2012