Skip to content
RichseenAtlasAtlasSign in

A randomised trial finds experienced developers slower with AI assistance

node

METR published a randomised controlled trial in which sixteen experienced open-source developers worked on 246 real issues in repositories they knew well — about five years of prior experience with the projects on average — using AI tools available between February and June 2025. They took 19% longer with the tools than without, and estimated afterwards that the tools had made them about 20% faster. The gap between the measured and the perceived effect is the finding that generalises furthest, because self-reported productivity gains are the evidence base for a very large share of public claims about this technology.

A node is not a place. Drawing it on a map would assert something about the world that no stored fact supports.

Read in · 1

Evidence · 1
Timeline

No dated observations are stored for this object. Atlas shows what was observed and when — it does not infer a history.

Connections · 3
Assembled narrative · 1

An assembled narrative is available for this object.

Observed changes · 0

No public Signals are attached to this object. Signals show what changed and when it was observed — never a direction or a rank.

Actions

Read the assembled narrativeContinue in StudioOpen TwinTwin does not start a decision from this kind of object.ShareSaveSaved objects are part of the authenticated projection, which is declared and not yet built.

/atlas?object=EVT_METR_DEVELOPER_RCT_2025