A randomised trial finds experienced developers slower with AI assistance
node
METR published a randomised controlled trial in which sixteen experienced open-source developers worked on 246 real issues in repositories they knew well — about five years of prior experience with the projects on average — using AI tools available between February and June 2025. They took 19% longer with the tools than without, and estimated afterwards that the tools had made them about 20% faster. The gap between the measured and the perceived effect is the finding that generalises furthest, because self-reported productivity gains are the evidence base for a very large share of public claims about this technology.
A node is not a place. Drawing it on a map would assert something about the world that no stored fact supports.
Read in · 1
Timeline
No dated observations are stored for this object. Atlas shows what was observed and when — it does not infer a history.
Connections · 3
- Machine-generated codeconcerns
- METRconcerns
- The difficulty of evaluating machine learning systemsconcerns
Assembled narrative · 1
An assembled narrative is available for this object.
Observed changes · 0
No public Signals are attached to this object. Signals show what changed and when it was observed — never a direction or a rank.
Actions
/atlas?object=EVT_METR_DEVELOPER_RCT_2025