The NIA rhesus study reports no significant survival benefit

node

The National Institute on Aging's parallel rhesus macaque study reports in Nature that caloric restriction did not significantly improve survival, contradicting the Wisconsin result. A 2017 joint analysis attributes the divergence to differences in diet composition, age at onset and the feeding of the control animals, which at Wisconsin may have been effectively overfed. The disagreement is the most instructive episode in the field.

A node is not a place. Drawing it on a map would assert something about the world that no stored fact supports.

Read in · 1

LongevityFuture

Evidence · 2

Timeline

No dated observations are stored for this object. Atlas shows what was observed and when — it does not infer a history.

Connections · 1

Caloric restrictionconcerns

Assembled narrative · 1

An assembled narrative is available for this object.

Observed changes · 0

No public Signals are attached to this object. Signals show what changed and when it was observed — never a direction or a rank.

Actions

Read the assembled narrative Continue in StudioOpen TwinTwin does not start a decision from this kind of object.ShareSaveSaved objects are part of the authenticated projection, which is declared and not yet built.

/atlas?object=EVT_LGV_RHESUS_NIA_2012