← Signals
Recordedyearscience

A hybrid model is proposed for the Indo-European origin

Heggarty and colleagues published a phylogenetic analysis using a substantially revised cognate dataset and a model allowing sampled ancestors — that is, allowing attested ancient languages to sit on the tree as ancestors rather than only as tips — and reported a root age older than the steppe hypothesis allows, with an origin south of the Caucasus and a subsequent role for the steppe in the dispersal of the European branches. The result is a hybrid rather than a vindication of either earlier position. As of the compiling of this pack in August 2026 the question is open, and this record deliberately does not report a resolution.

Historical — it happened, and the record is settled.

Subjects

Evidence

Partly verified — Core facts are sourced; some optional detail is deliberately absent.

Recorded on Bayesian phylogenetic dating of language families

  1. Proto-Indo-European is spoken
  2. Saussure posits consonants no language attests
  3. Kuryłowicz matches Hittite h to Saussure's coefficients
  4. A language tree is tested against a settlement chronology
  5. A Bayesian phylogeny dates Indo-European to the Anatolian Neolithic
  6. Phylogeography puts the Indo-European homeland in Anatolia
  7. Ancient DNA finds a mass movement from the steppe into Europe
  8. A dated phylogeny puts Sino-Tibetan at roughly seven thousand years
  9. A second phylogeny puts the same family at roughly six thousand years
  10. A hybrid model is proposed for the Indo-European origin

Related

Related because they share a subject in the Atlas — never because the text looks similar.