Fortress conservation
node
The protected-area doctrine, inherited from colonial game-reserve practice, that wildlife is best conserved in areas emptied of resident human use and defended against it. It produced the boundary logic of Serengeti, Ngorongoro, Kruger, Etosha and Amboseli, and it is the model against which every subsequent reform in this Journey — restitution, conservancies, transfrontier corridors — is a reaction. The term is analytical and originates in critical conservation scholarship; it is not how the agencies applying the doctrine described themselves, and using it should not substitute for describing what was actually done in each case.
A node is not a place. Drawing it on a map would assert something about the world that no stored fact supports.
Read in · 1
Evidence · 2
Timeline
No dated observations are stored for this object. Atlas shows what was observed and when — it does not infer a history.
Connections · 2
- Kruger National Parkaffects
- Serengeti National Parkaffects
Assembled narrative · 1
Assembled from 44 blocks · 2 evidence · 45 related
- Story
- The protected-area doctrine, inherited from colonial game-reserve practice, that wildlife is best conserved in areas emptied of resident human use and defended against it. It produced the boundary logic of Serengeti, Ngorongoro, Kruger, Etosha and Amboseli, and it is the model against which every subsequent reform in this Journey — restitution, conservancies, transfrontier corridors — is a reaction. The term is analytical and originates in critical conservation scholarship; it is not how the agencies applying the doctrine described themselves, and using it should not substitute for describing what was actually done in each case.
- Knowledge
- Serengeti National Park
- Kruger National Park
- Fortress conservation
- Connections
- Community conservancy (CBNRM model)
- Etosha National Park
- Kruger National Park
- Serengeti National Park
- Etosha proclaimed Game Reserve No. 2 by the German colonial administration
- Kruger National Park constituted from the Sabi and Shingwedzi reserves
- Serengeti National Park established on land used by Maasai pastoralists
- Makuleke community forcibly removed from Pafuri into Kruger National Park
- Tanzania begins relocating residents from Ngorongoro and demarcating Loliondo
- Black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis)
- South African National Parks (SANParks)
- Makuleke community
- Fortress conservation
- Kruger National Park constituted from the Sabi and Shingwedzi reserves
- Makuleke community forcibly removed from Pafuri into Kruger National Park
- Makuleke land claim settled; about 25,000 hectares of Kruger restored in title
- Blue Wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus)
- Maasai Mara National Reserve
- Mara River
- Serengeti–Mara Rainfall Gradient
- Serengeti Biodiversity Programme
- Rinderpest disappears from the Serengeti–Mara ecosystem
- The wildebeest population irrupts from roughly 250,000 to over a million
- Serengeti National Park inscribed on the UNESCO World Heritage List
- Drought kills roughly a quarter of the wildebeest population
- Edge degradation squeezes wildlife into the ecosystem core
- The Mara River crossings
- TAWIRI Aerial Point Survey estimates 1,366,109 wildebeest
- AI satellite survey returns fewer than 600,000, and is contested
- Ngorongoro Conservation Area
- Maasai
- Fortress conservation
- Serengeti National Park established on land used by Maasai pastoralists
- Serengeti closed to residence; Ngorongoro Conservation Area created and Maasai evicted from the plains
- Evidence
- The Makuleke were removed from the Pafuri area in 1969 and their land incorporated into Kruger National Park; a 1998 settlement restored roughly 25,000 hectares in title on condition of continued conservation use, with commercial rights to the community. South African protected areas were expanded through forced removals that post-1994 restitution law reopened as legal questions.
- Two 1959 statutes closed Serengeti National Park to human habitation and created the Ngorongoro Conservation Area (about 8,292 km2) as a multiple-land-use area for Maasai evicted from the plains; Maasai residents state in their own submission that permanent residence and grazing were the consideration for leaving the Serengeti, and that later restrictions and the relocation programme break that undertaking.
Observed changes · 0
No public Signals are attached to this object. Signals show what changed and when it was observed — never a direction or a rank.
Actions
/atlas?object=MODEL_FORTRESS_CONSERVATION&experience=MODEL_FORTRESS_CONSERVATION