Skip to content
RichseenAtlasJourneySign in

The Language Families

When these happened

28 dated records from 3005 BCE to 2032. Each is drawn as wide as its date is certain — a band is a band because nobody knows the year, not because the drawing is imprecise.

3000 BCE2500 BCE2000 BCE1500 BCE1000 BCE500 BCE0500100015002000Austronesian speakers move out of Taiwan — ~3000 BCEThe Bantu expansion begins in the Nigeria–Cameroon borderland — ~3000 BCEProto-Indo-European is spoken — ~3000 BCELapita voyagers enter Remote Oceania — c. 1350–800 BCEJones states the Indo-European hypothesis in Calcutta — 1786-02-02Rask publishes the Germanic consonant correspondences — 1818Grimm formulates the first sound shift as a system — 1822Verner explains the exceptions to Grimm's Law — 1877The Neogrammarian doctrine: sound laws admit no exception — 1878Saussure posits consonants no language attests — 1879The Boğazköy tablet archives are excavated — 1906Hrozný identifies Hittite as an Indo-European language — 1915Kuryłowicz matches Hittite h to Saussure's coefficients — 1927Dahl links Malagasy to Ma'anyan of southeastern Borneo — 1951The first edition of Ethnologue — 1951Glottochronology proposes to date language splits arithmetically — 1952Greenberg reduces Africa to four families — 1963Language in the Americas, and its rejection — 1987Blust's Austronesian subgrouping places the deepest divisions in Taiwan — 1999A language tree is tested against a settlement chronology — 2000A Bayesian phylogeny dates Indo-European to the Anatolian Neolithic — 2003UNESCO's Atlas of the World's Languages in Danger, third edition — 2010Phylogeography puts the Indo-European homeland in Anatolia — 2012Ancient DNA finds a mass movement from the steppe into Europe — 2015A dated phylogeny puts Sino-Tibetan at roughly seven thousand years — 2019A second phylogeny puts the same family at roughly six thousand years — 2019The International Decade of Indigenous Languages — 2022–2032A hybrid model is proposed for the Indo-European origin — 2023
28 shown · 28 dated · 2 cannot be placed on an axis · Approximate or contested. Draw a band and do not sharpen its edges.
In order28
  1. Sources disagree, or the dating is contested. Stated, not resolved.

  2. Sources disagree, or the dating is contested. Stated, not resolved.

  3. Sources disagree, or the dating is contested. Stated, not resolved.

  4. Sources disagree, or the dating is contested. Stated, not resolved.

  5. It happened, and the record is settled.

  6. It happened, and the record is settled.

  7. It happened, and the record is settled.

  8. It happened, and the record is settled.

  9. It happened, and the record is settled.

  10. It happened, and the record is settled.

  11. It happened, and the record is settled.

  12. It happened, and the record is settled.

  13. It happened, and the record is settled.

  14. It happened, and the record is settled.

  15. It happened, and the record is settled.

  16. It happened, and the record is settled.

  17. It happened, and the record is settled.

  18. It happened, and the record is settled.

  19. It happened, and the record is settled.

  20. It happened, and the record is settled.

  21. It happened, and the record is settled.

  22. It happened, and the record is settled.

  23. It happened, and the record is settled.

  24. It happened, and the record is settled.

  25. It happened, and the record is settled.

  26. Sources disagree, or the dating is contested. Stated, not resolved.

  27. A programme target or declared plan. NEVER a prediction.

  28. It happened, and the record is settled.

Not on the axis2
  • mid-first millennium CENo year could be read from this date without guessing at one.
  • early second millennium BCENo year could be read from this date without guessing at one.