Is rainfall the only cue, or is some of the route learned?
Rainfall and the vegetation flush that follows it reproduce the observed distribution across the year well enough to model it. That is not the same as showing rainfall is the sole cue, and how much learned or socially transmitted route knowledge contributes is unsettled. The collar dataset shows departures from the published calendar but does not adjudicate the question.
Is the calving-ground grass actually richer in phosphorus and calcium than grass elsewhere in the ecosystem?
This is the weakest link in the Journey's spine and canonical knowledge says so plainly. The mineral-quality explanation is the standard account and is repeated consistently, but a measured comparison between the plains and the northern woodlands was not located. The limit here is an absence in the sources rather than a dispute between them.
How many calves are actually born, and how many inside the window?
The widely circulated totals are derived from population size and pregnancy rate rather than counted, which means they move with whichever census estimate is used — and the census estimate is itself the subject of the final chapter. No primary study reporting the exact proportion born inside the three-week window was located.
What kills the animals that die at the crossings?
The total carcass input to the river is measured. The split between drowning, trampling in the crush and crocodile predation is not separately quantified in any source located, so the animal most associated with the crossings is the one whose share of them is least known.
Does the classical ordering of grazers by body size hold?
Partly. Collar, dietary and camera work published in 2024 found zebra and wildebeest travelling much closer together than the model predicted, with competition rather than facilitation pushing zebra ahead, while gazelle did trail the large migrants — but over a far shorter lag than originally proposed. The Journey keeps the model and its revision side by side rather than retiring one.
What follows from the loss of resilience at the boundaries?
The edge-degradation findings are measured across forty years and are not a forecast. No source located predicts when or whether the Serengeti circuit would fail, and the corpus states explicitly that any such projection should be treated as scenario rather than prediction. This Journey stops where the measurement stops.
How many wildebeest are there?
The most contested claim in the Journey. An aerial point survey and an AI satellite survey of the same population differ by more than a factor of two; the satellite authors framed their result as complementary and noted that timing, coverage and method could account for much of the gap, while named specialists rejected it as an abundance estimate. A correction to the satellite paper has been published and no reconciliation has. Nobody in the argument is claiming a die-off.